ZDL, Inc.'s Shipping Policies

Orders placed after 2:30pm EST will not be shipped until the following day.

International Customers are responsible for paying all duties, taxes, and any other customs fees themselves. ZDL, Inc. is not responsible for payment of any of these fees.

Signature Confirmation is an additional $5.00. Please make the request when checking out.

For a complete listing of all ZDL's Shipping Policies, please click here.

 

Semen Evaluation - SQA IIc-P

Financial Analysis

 

 

Sperm Quality Analyzer
SQA IIC-P

Sperm Quality Analyzer

Financial Analysis


There are two reasons that the SQA is less costly than microscopy. Obviously, the sum of disposables plus labor is lower, which results in lower direct costs.

 

Here is one calculation, based on labor rates at a California HMO.

Assumption Microscopy SQA
Tech wage (with 30% benefits) $20/hr Same
Labor Time 35 minutes 2 minutes
Labor Cost $11.67 $0.66
Cost of consumables Near zero $5.00
Total cost per test $11.67 $5.66
Savings per test   $6.01

 

There is a second labor factor. The figures above reflect the cost of a test assuming it is performed by a technician. Microscopic semen analysis requires judgment, and therefore is usually categorized as a "high complexity" test which in many facilities demands a laboratory scientist.

 

If that is the case in your group, and a laboratory scientists wage is similar to that in California, there are new numbers:  

Assumption Microscopy by LabSci SQA by Tech
Wage (with 30% benefits) $30/hr $20/hr
Labor Time 35 minutes 2 minutes
Labor Cost $17.50 $0.66
Cost of consumables Near zero $5.00
Total cost per test $17.50 $5.66
Savings per test   $11.84

Assuming the wage differential, if a lab does 20 tests per month, then annual SQA savings is substantial. Look at the numbers:

 

20 tests/month is 240 tests/year. 240 tests times a differential of $11.84 equals $2,841.60, Even using the same labor rate for both tests, the annual savings would be 240 times $6.01, or $1,442.40.

 

There is a second and far larger benefit, however. The ambiguity that is characteristic of microscopic evaluations results in a certain percentage of "faulty" initial screenings. Depending upon the practices of the facility and its physicians, the cost of such errors  may include unnecessary therapy and protocols, and additional diagnostic procedures for the other partner.

 

The objectivity of the SQA significantly reduces the incidence of such errors, and therefore the cost of unnecessary work afterward. Though this document will not attempt to quantify the benefit of consistent and accurate results, Progeny invites you to make that calculation based upon the historical performance of your group.

 

It's impossible to estimate how many erroneous fertility diagnoses were made during the past twelve months, and the subsequent additional cost of them. It is certain to be a significant number, and you can reduce that cost by at least 50% by using the SQA.

 

Since infertility issues are very time sensitive, the benefit to the patient-couple is improved as well, since the correct diagnosis will be made on the first pass. This benefit cannot easily be estimated in financial terms, but the emotional issues are substantial.


Search
Shopping cart
Store Links